What homecareOS does

The evidence is gathered while you work

Not a compliance module you visit once a year. Four things that run continuously, from the day you switch your nation on.

Evidence assembles itself

Twenty one rules watch the records you already keep. A completed training course, a falls risk assessment, an incident closed with learning, a right to work check: each writes a link to the framework item it evidences, at the moment it is filed. Nobody tags anything, and nothing is copied into a separate folder that then drifts.

Every date an inspector asks about

Care plan reviews, risk assessment reviews and the trigger that forced them, training expiry, background check renewals, supervisions, complaint response deadlines, audits, incident investigations and goal reviews. All tracked, all chaseable, all in one overdue view.

Records that cannot be quietly tidied

A MAR entry or care note can only be corrected with a written reason, with the original kept. Medicines record taken, refused or not administered as three different clinical events, with who recorded them and when. That immutability is the thing that makes the rest of your evidence worth showing.

Your nation, not a translation

Set your nation and the whole platform follows: the right regulator on printed documents, the right registration and background check vocabulary, the right mandatory training list, and the right ethnicity classification, which genuinely differs across the four nations.

CIW’s framework

All 12 lines of enquiry, and evidence linked to 12 of them

CIW’s inspection framework, across the three themes that apply to home care. homecareOS holds every one and applies the set that matches your nation.

3Well-being
4Care and Support
5Leadership and Management

Records you already keep are matched to the lines of enquiry they evidence as they are filed, through fourteen concepts: risk management, medicines safety, training, supervision, safe recruitment, safeguarding, infection prevention, governance and audit, complaints, person-centred planning, family involvement, people’s experience, outcomes and falls. For Wales that reaches 12 of 12, 100%.

Every line of enquiry that applies to a domiciliary support service has at least one evidence route. That is unusual, and it is because CIW writes its lines of enquiry around what a service actually does rather than around culture.

CIW works to four inspection themes, but its own framework limits Environment to “accommodation-based services only”, so a domiciliary support service is inspected and rated against three. LOE 12 exists for domiciliary support services only, and homecareOS carries it. Getting that right matters: it is the most commonly repeated error in vendor copy about Wales.

Know what to expect

What CIW has written about other agencies

Three findings from published CIW reports on domiciliary services, so you can check yourself against them before someone else does. Illustrations rather than a frequency table: the sample is small and weighted towards services that were struggling.

“Recording systems are fragmented between paper and electronic formats, causing gaps in documentation and limited oversight.”
a CIW domiciliary inspection · records and recording
“Existing audits and RI visits gave oversight but did not surface patterns and trends across the service.”
a CIW domiciliary inspection · quality of care review
“An electronic call monitoring system is in place but its full potential has not been realised.”
a CIW domiciliary inspection · governance and oversight
Stays with you

Three things to keep hold of yourself

Good software makes these easier to see and harder to forget. It does not do them for you, and an inspector will know the difference.

The Responsible Individual’s own visits

We hold the three-monthly meeting record and the six-monthly quality of care review, and chase both when they fall due. The conversations themselves, and the judgement in them, are the RI’s.

The Active Offer

Recording that someone wants their care in Welsh is a field, and we hold it. Rostering a Welsh-speaking carer to them is a staffing decision only you can make.

Getting value from the system you bought

CIW has written up a service whose call monitoring was in place but underused. Software you do not work is a finding waiting to happen, which is why remote training is in the Pro licence rather than sold as an extra.

On the way

What we are building next for Wales

Published so you can hold us to it, and so you know what to plan around in the meantime.

  • Personal plan clocks with the consultation and revision record CIW expects, including who was told and how
  • A missed and late call register, which feeds both your own oversight and the RI’s reporting
  • Quality of care review packs assembled from the six months of records rather than typed up from scratch

The wider roadmap →

Four nations

Your nation decides which framework you see

CIW and RISCA in more depth →

CIW FAQ

CIW Inspection, Answered

What CIW asks to see in Wales, and how the records support it.

Every visit, care note, medication record, observation and training entry is stored with a timestamp and the person who entered it, and an audit log records changes to the records that matter, including who changed a visit's carers and when. It is not a claim that every keystroke is captured. It means the evidence an inspector asks to see was created as the work happened rather than assembled afterwards, which is the difference they are actually testing for.
All four. CIW's framework in Wales, CQC's in England, the Care Inspectorate's in Scotland and RQIA's in Northern Ireland is applied from your agency's nation, along with the background check and the workforce register that go with it: the DBS in England and Wales, the PVG scheme in Scotland and AccessNI in Northern Ireland, and Social Care Wales, the SSSC or NISCC where individual registration is required. Nation is set once on the agency and then drives the compliance templates, the identifiers held against each carer and the wording on printed documents.
Yes, by holding the evidence it has to be built from. Regulation 80 of the 2017 Regulations requires the responsible individual to review the quality of care at least every six months and report on it, drawing on incidents, notifiable incidents, safeguarding matters, complaints and record audits. Those are the records the platform already keeps, so the review becomes a matter of reading them rather than reconstructing them. The three monthly visits under regulation 73 feed the same picture.
Incidents are logged against the person and the date they happened, not the date somebody got round to typing them up. Each one carries follow-up actions with owners and due dates, safeguarding referrals are tracked separately with their own status, and the timeline stays attached to the person's record. Carers can report an incident from the app during or after a visit, so the first account comes from the person who was there.
Yes. You can build audit templates, schedule them to repeat, assign the actions that come out of them and track those to completion. Self-assessment maps your own view of the service against your regulator's framework so you can see the gaps while you still have time to close them.

See it against your own records

Start free for up to 5 carers, or book half an hour and bring the findings from your last inspection.