What homecareOS does

The evidence is gathered while you work

Not a compliance module you visit once a year. Four things that run continuously, from the day you switch your nation on.

Evidence assembles itself

Twenty one rules watch the records you already keep. A completed training course, a falls risk assessment, an incident closed with learning, a right to work check: each writes a link to the framework item it evidences, at the moment it is filed. Nobody tags anything, and nothing is copied into a separate folder that then drifts.

Every date an inspector asks about

Care plan reviews, risk assessment reviews and the trigger that forced them, training expiry, background check renewals, supervisions, complaint response deadlines, audits, incident investigations and goal reviews. All tracked, all chaseable, all in one overdue view.

Records that cannot be quietly tidied

A MAR entry or care note can only be corrected with a written reason, with the original kept. Medicines record taken, refused or not administered as three different clinical events, with who recorded them and when. That immutability is the thing that makes the rest of your evidence worth showing.

Your nation, not a translation

Set your nation and the whole platform follows: the right regulator on printed documents, the right registration and background check vocabulary, the right mandatory training list, and the right ethnicity classification, which genuinely differs across the four nations.

CQC’s framework

All 33 quality statements, and evidence linked to 23 of them

CQC’s assessment framework, across the five key questions. homecareOS holds every one and applies the set that matches your nation.

8Safe
6Effective
5Caring
7Responsive
7Well-led

Records you already keep are matched to the quality statements they evidence as they are filed, through fourteen concepts: risk management, medicines safety, training, supervision, safe recruitment, safeguarding, infection prevention, governance and audit, complaints, person-centred planning, family involvement, people’s experience, outcomes and falls. For England that reaches 23 of 33, 70%.

The other ten are the quality statements about culture, leadership, partnership working and equality. An inspector expects to hear those from you and your team, in conversation, not to read them off a dashboard. We would rather point you at them early than let a system imply they are covered.

CQC is changing its framework. It consulted on replacing the single assessment framework with sector-specific ones, that consultation closed on 12 June 2026, and adult social care is getting its own framework again. We track the change and will move with it. Nothing here states an implementation date, because CQC has not published one.

Know what to expect

What CQC has written about other agencies

Three findings from published CQC reports on domiciliary services, so you can check yourself against them before someone else does. Illustrations rather than a frequency table: the sample is small and weighted towards services that were struggling.

“The provider failed to establish and operate systems and processes to assess, monitor and improve the quality and safety of the service.”
Canterbury Oast Trust · Regulation 17, good governance
“There were no protocols in place instructing staff when as-required (PRN) medicines should be administered.”
a 2026 CQC assessment · medicines optimisation
“The provider did not operate robust recruitment procedures, including undertaking any relevant checks.”
Adina Home Care Services · Regulation 19, fit and proper persons
Stays with you

Three things to keep hold of yourself

Good software makes these easier to see and harder to forget. It does not do them for you, and an inspector will know the difference.

Having enough carers on the rota

Insufficient staffing was cited in three of the eleven reports we read. The rota shows you the gap the moment it appears, and the cover finder shortens a phone list to a shortlist, but the decision to recruit is yours.

The quality of what gets written

Inspectors mark down care plans that say only “provide reassurance”. Templates and mandatory fields raise the floor and prompt for the detail. What good looks like still comes from your team.

Acting on what the audit found

Several findings describe audits that ran, flagged a problem, and were then left. We will surface the finding and chase the action past its date. Closing it is a management job.

On the way

What we are building next for England

Published so you can hold us to it, and so you know what to plan around in the meantime.

  • Improvement actions grouped by the framework you are actually inspected against, carried forward from one inspection to the next with the evidence attached
  • A missed and late visit register with the period analysis, so the pattern is ready before anyone asks for it
  • Evidence routes extended further across the quality statements as the new sector framework lands

The wider roadmap →

Four nations

Your nation decides which framework you see

CQC registration for a new agency →

CQC FAQ

CQC Inspection, Answered

What CQC asks to see, and what the platform can show them.

Every visit, care note, medication record, observation and training entry is stored with a timestamp and the person who entered it, and an audit log records changes to the records that matter, including who changed a visit's carers and when. It is not a claim that every keystroke is captured. It means the evidence an inspector asks to see was created as the work happened rather than assembled afterwards, which is the difference they are actually testing for.
All four. CQC's framework in England, CIW's in Wales, the Care Inspectorate's in Scotland and RQIA's in Northern Ireland is applied from your agency's nation, along with the background check and the workforce register that go with it: the DBS in England and Wales, the PVG scheme in Scotland and AccessNI in Northern Ireland, and Social Care Wales, the SSSC or NISCC where individual registration is required. Nation is set once on the agency and then drives the compliance templates, the identifiers held against each carer and the wording on printed documents.
Yes. The PIR screen is populated from your live records, so figures such as active carers, the proportion with two references on file, training compliance and incident counts come from the system rather than from a fortnight of counting. You review and edit every section before you export it, because it is your return and your words, not an automatic submission.
Incidents are logged against the person and the date they happened, not the date somebody got round to typing them up. Each one carries follow-up actions with owners and due dates, safeguarding referrals are tracked separately with their own status, and the timeline stays attached to the person's record. Carers can report an incident from the app during or after a visit, so the first account comes from the person who was there.
Yes. You can build audit templates, schedule them to repeat, assign the actions that come out of them and track those to completion. Self-assessment maps your own view of the service against your regulator's framework so you can see the gaps while you still have time to close them.

See it against your own records

Start free for up to 5 carers, or book half an hour and bring the findings from your last inspection.